Monday, June 24, 2013

AMD Radeon HD 7990 Review: 7990 Gets Official

Officially canonized back in 2008 with AMD’s “small die” strategy, dual-GPU cards have since become a staple of AMD’s product lineup. Filling a small-but-important niche for AMD, dual-GPU cards allow AMD to both deliver ultra-enthusiast performance levels their traditional single-GPU products can’t offer, and at the same time compete with NVIDIA’s big die flagship cards without AMD needing to produce a big die GPU of their own. As a result, though these cards aren’t necessarily obligatory, with each generation we’re left eagerly awaiting just what AMD has in store for their capstone product.
Of course with that said, like so many other facets of the 7000 series, the dual-GPU situation has played out rather unusually in the past year. In a typical year we would see AMD release a standard design, and then later on partners like Asus and PowerColor would release their own custom designs in the name of product differentiation and squeezing out just a bit more performance. Instead the 7000 series has played out in reverse: Asus and PowerColor released their designs first. Consequently, up until this point the 7990 has been “officially unofficial”, reflecting the fact that the first 7990s were AMD sanctioned products, but not based on AMD designs.
But at long last the 7990 is becoming fully official. AMD is getting into the game with their own 7990 design, and perhaps more importantly they’re doing so while coming to bear with the kind of engineering resources that only a GPU manufacturer can provide. This isn’t going to be the first 7990 – that honor belongs to PowerColor’s 7990 – but this is unquestionably the most important 7990.  For AMD and their partners going official doesn’t just mean the AMD is taking a greater role in matters, but as we’ll see it means changing the rules of the game entirely.
AMD GPU Specification Comparison
  AMD Radeon HD 7990 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition AMD Radeon HD 7970 AMD Radeon HD 6990
Stream Processors 2 x 2048 2048 2048 2 x 1536
Texture Units 2 x 128 128 128 2 x 96
ROPs 2 x 32 32 32 2 x 32
Core Clock 950MHz 1000MHz 925MHz 830MHz
Boost Clock 1000MHz 1050MHz N/A N/A
Memory Clock 6GHz GDDR5 6GHz GDDR5 5.5GHz GDDR5 5GHz GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 2 x 384-bit 384-bit 384-bit 2 x 256-bit
VRAM 2 x 3GB 3GB 3GB 2 x 2GB
FP64 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4
Transistor Count 2 x 4.31B 4.31B 4.31B 2 x 2.64B
PowerTune Limit/TDP 375W 250W+ 250W 375W
Manufacturing Process TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 40nm
Architecture GCN GCN GCN VLIW4
Launch Date 04/23/2013 06/22/2012 01/09/2012 03/11/2011
Launch Price $999 $499 $549 $699
Diving right into the thick of things, like the officially unofficial cards before it, AMD’s 7990 is a dual-Tahiti part, placing two of AMD’s flagship GPUs on a single PCB to make a single card. AMD has held nothing back and these are fully enabled GPUs, so each GPU has all 2048 stream processors, 32 ROPs, and their full 384-bit memory buses present. Joining these GPUs is 6GB of GDDR5 RAM, split up between the two GPUs for the 7900-series standard of 3GB of VRAM per GPU.
The big question with any dual-GPU card of course is what kinds of clockspeeds it can run at, and as a turns out the 7990 can clock rather high. The 7990 is a PowerTune Boost part like the 7970GE it’s based on, giving the card a base clockspeed of 950MHz, and a boost clock of 1000MHz. Meanwhile the memory is clocked at 6GHz, the same as the 7970GE. As a result the 7990 is surprisingly close to being a 7970GE Crossfire setup on a single card, clocked just 50MHz below AMD’s single-GPU flagship card. In fact this is better than some of the earlier 7990s such as PowerColor’s, which were clocked lower and simultaneously lacked PT Boost.
But perhaps the most defining aspect of AMD’s 7990, and the thing that sets it apart from unofficial 7990s that came before it is the TDP. AMD’s 7990 has an official TDP of just 375W, which although common for official dual-GPU cards, is quite a bit lower than the TDPs of the unofficial 7990s. As the GPU manufacturer AMD has the ability to do finely grained binning that their partners cannot, so while Asus and PowerColor have essentially been putting together cards that really are two 7970s on a single card – right down to the TDP – official 7990s get the advantage of AMD’s binning process, significantly reducing power consumption. The end result is that while an unofficial 7990 would be a 450W+ part, AMD can deliver the same or better performance while consuming much less power, putting the 7990 within the all-important 375W envelope that OEMs and boutique builders look for.
While we’re on the subject of power, this is the first official AMD dual-GPU part to include AMD’s ZeroCore power technology, which was introduced with the GCN family. ZeroCore as you might recall allows AMD to almost completely shut off slave GPUs when they’re not in use, which in turn allows AMD to further reduce their idle power consumption. The biggest benefits are found in multi-card setups since this allows the fans on those slave cards to be shut down, but even on the 7990 it still provides a benefit by allowing AMD to curtail their idle power consumption. Consequently this pushes the idle TDP of the 7990 down to around 20W, which is greater than a single card, but a clear improvement over 6990 and earlier AMD dual-GPU cards.
Moving on to product stacks and competition, it comes as no great surprise that AMD is placing their newest flagship part directly opposite NVIDIA’s flagship cards. AMD doesn’t produce a GPU equivalent to GTX Titan’s massive GK110 GPU, so the 7990 is AMD’s official answer to both Titan and NVIDIA’s own dual-GPU card, the nearly year-old GTX 690. In the case of the GTX 690 it’s a rather straightforward matchup since both cards are based on the same principles, while against Titan AMD needs to make a case about raw performance versus the inherent simplicity of a single-GPU solution over a dual-GPU solution.
Along those lines, since AMD is placing the 7990 against NVIDIA’s flagships they will also be pricing it directly against NVIDIA’s flagships, setting the MSRP for the 7990 at $999. This steep price tag raised some ire with the GTX 690 and with GTX Titan, and it likely will here once more. But with single 7970GEs still regularly going for $400-$500 and the fact that AMD is throwing in their best Tahiti chips into 7990, there’s little incentive to charge less. A 7970GE CF setup will be both faster and cheaper, but as a pair of those cards take up 6 slots after accounting for cooling needs, AMD can bank on the fact that the 7990 is essentially the same size as a 7970GE, charging a premium for the size advantage.
Ultimately customers interested in the 7990 will have a bit of time to sit on the matter and decide if they want one. The 7990 is being launched ahead of its actual retail availability, with AMD telling us the cards will hit etailers within two weeks. Meanwhile all of AMD’s usual partners will be participating on this 7990, so expect to see 7990 cards from all of major AMD partners, and sold at all of the major etailers.
Finally, AMD has been having a blast with game bundles over the last few months, and they won’t be stopping with the 7990. In a game bundle that quite frankly I cannot recall being rivaled by anything else done in the last 20 years, AMD will be bundling the 7990 with 8 different games from the current and past Never Settle bundles. All of AMD’s current bundle titles are included: Crysis 3, Bioshock Infinite, Tomb Raider, and Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon. Along with that AMD is also packing in the best games out of their previous bundles: Far Cry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Sleeping Dogs, and Deus Ex: Human Revolution. Simply put, 7990 buyers will be well-stocked for games to play on their new video card.
Meanwhile on housekeeping note, AMD will be changing how vouchers are distributed for the 7990; rather than having etailers distribute the vouchers with qualifying purchases, AMD’s partners will be packing the vouchers into the product box. Though the etailers have been good about including vouchers, they do at times forget them. So for the 7990 AMD and their partners aren’t going to be taking any chances.
April 2013 GPU Pricing Comparison
AMD Price NVIDIA
AMD Radeon HD 7990 $1000 GeForce GTX Titan/GTX 690
PowerColor Radeon HD 7990 $900  
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition $450 GeForce GTX 680
Radeon HD 7970 $390  
  $350 GeForce GTX 670
Radeon HD 7950 $300  

Friday, June 21, 2013

4th Generation Intel® Core™  i7 Processor

Amazing performance and stunning visuals at their best. Get top-of-the-line performance for your most demanding tasks with a 4th generation Intel® Core™ i7 processor. For a difference you can see and feel in HD and 3-D, multitasking and multimedia, the 4th generation Intel Core i7 processor is perfect for all your most demanding tasks.
Effortlessly move through applications with smart multitasking from Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology1. Enjoy the thrill of an automatic burst of speed when you need it with Intel® Turbo Boost Technology 2.02. Experience your movies, photos, and games smoothly and seamlessly with a suite of built-in visual enhancements—no extra hardware required3.
Get a boost in performance you can see and feel, along with longer battery life, built-in security for deeper protection4, and extra peace of mind from enhanced security. Choose the 4th generation Intel Core i7 processor for whatever you want to accomplish. Because the only thing more amazing than Intel® technology is what you’ll do with it.
Additional performance information: 5

Product Brief:  Preview |  Download

 

Specifications

Processor Number Cache Clock Speed # of Cores/
# of Threads
Max TDP/
Power
Memory Types Graphics
Intel® Core™ i7-4950HQ Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.60 GHz) 6.0 MB 2.40 GHz 4 / 8 47 DDR3L-1333,1600 Intel® Iris™ Pro graphics 5200
Intel® Core™ i7-4850HQ Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 6.0 MB 2.30 GHz 4 / 8 47 DDR3L-1333,1600 Intel® Iris™ Pro graphics 5200
Intel® Core™ i7-4750HQ Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.20 GHz) 6.0 MB 2.00 GHz 4 / 8 47 DDR3L-1333,1600 Intel® Iris™ Pro graphics 5200
Intel® Core™ i7-4770R Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.90 GHz) 6.0 MB 3.20 GHz 4 / 8 65 DDR3L-1333/1600 Intel® Iris™ Pro graphics 5200

4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processor


Less waiting. More doing. Multitask up to 4x faster.
Discover the thrill of an automatic burst of speed when you need it with Intel® Turbo Boost Technology 2.0. 1 Experience your movies, photos, and games smoothly and seamlessly with a built-in suite of visual enhancements3—and enjoy them even more with longer battery life.
Get a boost in your performance that you can truly see and feel, along with extra peace
 of mind from enhanced security. Because the only thing more amazing than Intel® technology is what you’ll do with it.
Additional performance information: 4, 5
Product Brief:  Preview |  Download


Specifications


Processor Number Cache Clock Speed # of Cores/
# of Threads
Max TDP/
Power
Memory Types Graphics
Intel® Core™ i5-4570R Processor (4M Cache, up to 3.20 GHz) 4.0 MB 2.70 GHz 4 / 4 65 DDR3L-1333/1600 Intel® Iris™ Pro graphics 5200
Intel® Core™ i5-4670R Processor (4M Cache, up to 3.70 GHz) 4.0 MB 3.00 GHz 4 / 4 65 DDR3L-1333/1600 Intel® Iris™ Pro graphics 5200
Intel® Core™ i5-4250U Processor (3M Cache, up to 2.60 GHz) 3.0 MB 1.30 GHz 2 / 4 15 DDR3L-1333/1600; LPDDR3-1333/1600 Intel® HD graphics 5000
Intel® Core™ i5-4350U Processor (3M Cache, up to 2.90 GHz) 3.0 MB 1.40 GHz 2 / 4 15 DDR3L-1333/1600; LPDDR3-1333/1600 Intel® HD graphics 5000
 

4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processor

Amazing performance and stunning visuals start here. Get a smooth, seamless visual experience with a 4th generation Intel® Core™ i3 processor, featuring longer battery life and built-in security for deeper protection.1

Effortlessly move among applications with smart multitasking from Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology2. Experience your movies, photos, and games smoothly and seamlessly with a suite of built-in visual enhancements—no extra hardware required3.
Get a difference in performance that you can truly see and feel, along with peace of mind from enhanced security and better flexibility with longer battery life. Because the only thing more amazing than Intel® technology is what you’ll do with it.

Additional performance information: 4
Product Brief:  Preview |  Download
Supported System Types:
Intel® Core™ i3 Processors

Specifications

Processor Number Cache Clock Speed # of Cores/
# of Threads
Max TDP/
Power
Memory Types Graphics
Intel® Core™ i3-4010U Processor (3M Cache, 1.70 GHz) 3.0 MB 1.70 GHz 2 / 4 15 DDR3L-1333/1600; LPDDR3-1333/1600 Intel® HD Graphics 4400
Intel® Core™ i3-4100U Processor (3M Cache, 1.80 GHz) 3.0 MB 1.80 GHz 2 / 4 15 DDR3L-1333/1600; LPDDR3-1333/1600 Intel® HD Graphics 4400
Intel® Core™ i3-4010Y Processor (3M Cache, 1.30 GHz) 3.0 MB 1.30 GHz 2 / 4
DDR3L-1333/1600, LPDDR3-1333/1600 Intel® HD Graphics 4200
Intel® Core™ i3-4158U Processor (3M Cache, 2.00 GHz) 3.0 MB 2.00 GHz 2 / 4 28 DDR3L-1333/1600 Intel® Iris™ graphics 5100

Intel® Solid-State Drive DC S3500 Series

Intel® Solid-State Drive DC S3500 Series

Consistently amazing

The Intel® SSD DC S3500 Series combines fast, consistent read performance with strong data protection and low active power levels to provide superior quality of service for video conferencing, big data analytics, or virtual client applications. Consistently low read latencies of 50µs typical (500µs max for 99.9% of the time) along with a tight distribution of up to 75,000 input/output per second (IOPS)1 delivers a high-performance, reliable, and efficient SSD specifically designed for data center application upgrades.
Key features and benefits of this drive include an Intel® 3rd generation controller, industry-leading 20nm multi-level cell (MLC) NAND flash technology, full end-to-end data protection, enhanced power-loss data protection, and a broad range of capacities up to 800GB.
Product Brief:  Preview |  Download
Product Specification:  Preview |  Download
Supported System Types:

Capacity Sequential Read/Write (up to)1 Random 4KB Read (up to)/Write (up to)2 Form Factor
80GB SATA 6 Gb/s      340 MB/s / 100 MB/s 70,000 IOPS / 7,000 IOPS 2.5 and 1.8-inch SATA
120GB SATA 6 Gb/s      445 MB/s / 135 MB/s 75,000 IOPS / 4,600 IOPS 2.5-inch SATA
160GB SATA 6 Gb/s      475 MB/s / 175 MB/s 75,000 IOPS / 7,500 IOPS 2.5-inch SATA
240GB SATA 6 Gb/s      500 MB/s / 260 MB/s 75,000 IOPS / 7,500 IOPS 2.5 and 1.8-inch SATA
300GB SATA 6 Gb/s      500 MB/s / 315 MB/s 75,000 IOPS / 9,000 IOPS 2.5-inch SATA
400GB SATA 6 Gb/s      500 MB/s / 380 MB/s 75,000 IOPS / 11,000 IOPS 1.8-inch SATA
480GB SATA 6 Gb/s      500 MB/s / 410 MB/s 75,000 IOPS / 11,000 IOPS 2.5-inch SATA
600GB SATA 6 Gb/s      500 MB/s / 410 MB/s 75,000 IOPS / 11,000 IOPS 2.5-inch SATA
800GB SATA 6 Gb/s      500 MB/s / 450 MB/s 75,000 IOPS / 11,500 IOPS 2.5 and 1.8-inch SATA

Intel® Desktop Board DZ87KLT-75K

Intel® Desktop Board DZ87KLT-75K

Intel® Desktop Board DZ87KLT-75K
Intel® Desktop Board DZ87KLT-75K
Whether you are into extreme gaming, overclocking, or high-end video manipulation, Intel® Desktop Board DZ87KLT-75K is the motherboard for you. This board has been highly optimized for the Intel® –K processor line to take full advantage of all that the processor family has to offer.
Support for CrossFireX* and SLI*, USB 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s, and dual LAN allows endless connection possibilities. And if you enjoy pushing the envelope with the ultimate in connectivity, this board offers on-board Thunderbolt™ technology for blistering bidirectional 10 Gb/s transfer rates.
Nothing moves content in and out of your system faster. All this in a board from Intel—your trusted technology team.
Product Brief:  Preview |  Download
Supported System Types:
Features and configurations
Form factor
ATX
AA# (Altered Assembly)
G74721-xxx
BIOS ID string
KLZ8711D.86A
Processor
Supports the 4th generation Intel® Core™ i7 processor, Intel® Core™ i5 processor and other Intel® processors in the LGA1150 package, highly optimized for the Intel® –K processor line
Memory
  • Dual channel DDR3 2400+MHz O.C, DDR3 1600/1333 MHz,
  • Supports Intel® Extreme Memory Profile (Intel® XMP)
  • Support for up to 32 GB of system memory
Chipset
Display
  • Three PCI Express* 3.0 x16 graphics slots (switchable to x8 or x4)
  • Supports ATI CrossfireX* and NVIDIA SLI*
  • HDMI* display connector
Audio
Intel® High Definition Audio1 subsystem in the following configuration:
  • 10-channel (8+2) Intel® High Definition Audio
  • Five stack analog audio ports with optical S/PDIF out and S/PDIF header
  • Front panel microphone/headphone header
LAN support
Gigabit Ethernet controller
Peripheral interfaces
  • Eight USB 2.0 ports (two back panel ports, six via internal headers – includes two high-current back panel ports and two high-current internal ports for charging)
  • Eight USB 3.0 ports (six back panel ports, two via internal headers )
  • One PS/2 connector (keyboard or mouse)
Expansion capabilities

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Computex 2013: Intel and Windows 8 Convertibles - Samsung

WWDC: MacBook Air line-up refreshed

Gets the latest generation Intel Haswell processors, offering better graphics and battery life. No word yet on when the MacBook Pro will get the refresh.
WWDC: MacBook Air line-up refreshed
With Intel’s official Haswell launch done and dusted, it was expected that Apple will announce the processor upgrades for the MacBook Air and the MacBook Pro line-up. While there was no activity regarding the MacBook Pro, the MacBook Air line-up did get the new processor. However, there is no design change, and the Retina Display remains very much elusive.
Apple introduced the new MacBook Air, with the focus primarily on what Apple claims will offer “all day battery life”. Apple says that the new MacBook Air features power-efficient fourth generation Intel Core i5 and Core i7 processors that give the 13-inch MacBook Air up to 12 hours of battery life and up to 10 hours of iTunes movie playback. The 11-inch MacBook Air delivers up to 9 hours of battery life and up to 8 hours of iTunes movie playback.

The Intel HD Graphics 5000 offer up to 40 percent faster performance for gaming and graphics intensive apps than the Intel HD 4000 graphics seen with Ivy Bridge. The 2013 MacBook Air also comes with a new flash storage, which is up to 45 percent faster than the previous generation flash storage in the MacBook Air, and nine times faster than traditional hard drives on the MacBook Pro.
The MacBook Air will ship with OSX Mountain Lion, and goes on sale now. The India Pricing for the 11-inch and 13-inch versions, as shared by Apple is as follows:
The 11-inch MacBook Air comes with a 1.3 GHz processor with Turbo Boost speeds up to 2.6 GHz, 4GB of memory and is available with 128GB of flash storage starting at INR 67,900 inc VAT (INR 64,666.67 ex VAT), and 256GB of flash storage starting at INR 81,900 inc VAT (INR 78,000 ex VAT).
The 13-inch MacBook Air comes with a 1.3 GHz processor with Turbo Boost speeds up to 2.6 GHz, 4GB of memory and is available with 128GB of flash storage starting at INR 74,900 inc VAT (INR 71,333.33 ex VAT), and 256GB of flash storage starting at INR 88,900 inc VAT (INR 84,666.67 ex VAT).
Apple says that you can optionally configure the machine to include a 1.7 GHz Intel Core i7 processor with Turbo Boost speeds up to 3.3 GHz, up to 8GB of memory and up to 512GB flash storage.
The 2013 MacBook Air supports the latest generation 802.11ac Wi-Fi for wireless performance that is up to three times faster when connected to an 802.11ac base station. In line with that, the company also announced the new AirPort hardware. The new base stations feature three-stream 802.11ac Wi-Fi technology with a maximum data rate of 1.3Gbps, almost three times faster than 802.11n. The new AirPort base stations also include high-powered radios and a six-element beam-forming antenna array to maximise range and performance.
Featuring 2TB or 3TB hard drives, AirPort Time Capsule is meant for Time Machine backups. AirPort Extreme is available for a suggested retail price of INR 14,200 inc VAT (INR 12,511.01 ex VAT). AirPort Time Capsule comes in two models: 2TB of storage for INR 19,900 inc VAT (INR 18,952.38 ex VAT) and 3TB of storage for INR 25,900 inc VAT (INR 24,666.67 ex VAT).

Checkout the new Samsung Ultrabooks Range

HP Pavilion m4-1003tx Review

Summary

The HP Pavilion m4-1003tx takes the benchmark to the next level, putting all the immediate rivals in the shade in terms of build-quality and performance at the price. By a huge margin. The keyboard is the same brilliant one carried forward from the more expensive from ENVY dv6 notebook. Add a slim form factor, good build quality and the fact that it can game quite efficiently into the mix, and this is definitely a machine worth considering. Put that into perspective with the price tag - Rs. 49,990 - and the entire package feels like a very good deal.
  • Review
  • Specifications & Performance
We have said it time and again that the difference between a high-end notebook and an affordable one is just too visible – build quality, specification sheet and eventually, the performance. The lesser priced laptops always get the inferior stuff, and the premium stuff only starts showing up once you were ready to pay Rs. 60,000 or above. This compromise cannot be appreciated, for it hinders the experience one would expect from a laptop.
However, things could be changing. First, Acer launched the Aspire V3 notebook earlier this year. And that was a fairly good quality product, at just shy of Rs. 50,000. Lenovo, around the same time, introduced the slimmer Z-series notebook, the IdeaPad Z500. Now, however, the game has been taken to another level. HP, with the Pavilion m4-1003tx notebook, is basically telling the customer – you don’t need to compromise on the experience, just because you aren’t paying Rs. 65,000 for a laptop! And that is very much appreciated.
Build & Design: The Gloss is Back
The recent machines emerging from HP’s offices – the ENVY dv6, the ENVY TouchSmart 4, Spectre XT and the ENVY 4 ultrabook – have all sported a positive change. That being, they had the matte finish, irrespective of the colour, with a classy imprint or brushed metal design. For a while, it seemed as though the glossy finish seen on the Pavilion dv series of laptops till some years back, was going away for good, maybe we could safely stow away that cleaning cloth. But no, it’s back with the Pavilion m4-1003tx! Our only issue with the glossy and shiny finish on a laptop is that it is maintenance heavy, as it tends to catch fingerprints, scratches, nicks and dust very quickly, all of which are very visible. Even though the machine itself may be new, the combination of these make it look very old, very quickly.
The Pavilion m4-1003tx notebook has some rather unique design elements. For starters, take the laptop out of the box, and the thin form factor appeals straightaway. It isn’t as thin as some ultrabooks, mostly because of the optical drive being present on m4, but is fairly close to that genre of devices. At 2kg, for a machine with a 14-inch display, the Pavilion m4-1003tx’s weight is very much acceptable. The nearest rival, the Acer Aspire V3-53234G75Makk, is noticeably thicker than the Pavilion m4, and at 2.3kg, also weighs more than the m4. Incidentally, the Aspire V3 is one notebook that has a glossy finish almost throughout. The Lenovo IdeaPad Z500 does walk a middle path between the two. While having a bigger footprint because of the bigger display size, the Z500 does remain fairly slim. The all-matte finish does look good, even though it tends end up with a tad too much dust sticking on it!
The HP Pavilion m4-1003tx’s lid has a matte finish with the brushed metal design, similar to what we saw on the much more expensive elder sibling, the ENVY dv6-7206tx. Open the lid and this is where things change. The keyboard deck is completely glossy, albeit carrying the same black coloured theme. This finish also encompasses an imprint design, but slightly different from the one on the lid. The keys themselves have the non-gloss finish.
The port placement is evenly spread on both sides of the Pavilion m4-1003tx. The right side has the optical drive, one USB port and the 3.5mm headphone jack. The left side has two more USB ports, the HDMI out, the Ethernet jack and a generous cooling vent. No ports are placed behind the display.
When you look at the machine from side-on, the design does give the illusion that it is thicker at the back and thinner at the front. However, that is mostly visual trickery, and the Pavilion m4-1003tx retains much the same thickness throughout. The curve on the side where the display hinge sits looks more profound because of the grey colour treatment, and looks good.
The Pavilion m4-1003txs’ lid has very minimal flex, only when you push on it unnaturally hard. There is no flex anywhere on the palmrest areas, or even in the middle of the keyboard, no matter how hard you press. There are a lot of vents on the underside and on the side to keep the machine fairly cool. When the laptop is placed on the lap, and you are furiously typing on it, the display does not shake or vibrate. The hinge is fairly taut, but doesn’t feel hard or require extra exertion to open the lid.
There is no doubt that the Pavilion m4-1003tx is a very well-built machine, and this kind of quality isn’t very common this side of Rs. 50,000. In terms of the slimness, weight and the quantity of the maintenance hungry glossy finish, the HP Pavilion m4 has the advantage over almost all of its rivals.
Features & Specs: The Surprises Keep Building
The specification sheet of the Pavilion m4 does make for rather pleasing reading, for anyone who is looking to buy the machine. This packs in the Intel Core i5 – 3230M processor clocking at 2.6GHz. The Turbo Boost mode takes it up to 3.0GHz. But here comes the interesting bit – packs in 8GB of RAM, something that is fairly unheard of, till now, in this price bracket. Having a decent amount of RAM and the extra headroom makes the OS and all the apps work much better, and this is something we will compare in detail in the performance section.
Specification Comparison
Model
HP Pavilion m4-1003tx
Acer Aspire V3-571G-53234G75Makk
Lenovo IdeaPad Z500
Processor
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i5-3230M
 Intel Core i5-3210M
Cores
2
2
2
Clock Speeds
2.6GHz
2.6GHz
2.5GHz
Clock Speeds (Turbo Boost)
3.2GHz
3.2GHz
-
RAM
8GB
4GB
6GB
Storage Type
HDD
HDD
HDD
Storage Capacity
1TB
750GB
1TB
Graphics
Nvidia GeForce 730M
Nvidia GeForce 710M
Nvidia GT645M
Dedicated Graphics Memory
2GB
2GB
2GB

Compared to the Aspire V3, the Pavilion m4 has a 1TB hard drive, while the V3 only packs in a 750GB drive. Both machines have an optical drive each, and both arrive on your doorstep preloaded with Windows 8. The m4 has a 14-inch LED backlit display, with a resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels. The Aspire V3 and the Lenovo Z500 offer a bigger 15.6-inch display, with the same resolution.
Performance: Impressive, Very!
For the sake of a direct comparison, we pitted the Pavilion m4-1003tx against the Acer Aspire V3, primarily because both machines have the same processor and are available for relatively the same price.
System Performance: First, we take a look at some benchmark tests. We start off with the PC Mark 07 test. The test score of 3165 for the Core i5-3230M puts it comfortably ahead of all but one Core i5 (Ivy Bridge) versions. Only the Core i5-3317U in the Sony Vaio T-series notebooks is scoring more in the same benchmark test. To put it simply, the 3230M is scoring more than the Core i7-3632QM (2879 PC Marks – Lenovo IdeaPad Y500) and the Core i7-3612QM (2658 PC Marks - Dell Inspiron 14 Turbo), for example. To put simply, the HP Pavilion m4 does offer blazing fast performance, at least as far as the numbers are concerned.
Just to verify the processor similarity, the CineBench CPU test pegs the two at pretty much the same scores. Hence, the performance difference between the two machines, as shown in the PC Mark test points to the advantage the HP machine has because of the additional RAM and possibly better optimization of the marriage between the hardware and the operating system. We, on our part, ensure that all system settings are the same across all machines, to ensure a completely level base for all tests.
In the real world usage, the HP Pavilion m4 does feel appreciably quicker. The additional RAM, and less preloaded utilities does help considerably. Over time, we have noticed how HP has streamlined its own applications and software into a concise package. The number of trials and free software has been cut down as well, and that really helps keep the machine in better working condition out-of-the-box.
Graphics Performance: For a machine that is rather affordable, the specification surprises just keep on coming. The Pavilion m4 packs in an Nvidia GeForce 730M (2GB) graphics chip. The 730M is based on the Nvidia GeForce GT645M, but with higher clock speeds. Since the GT645M was one of the top performers in the gaming benchmark scores across all laptops, the 730M should offer similar, if not better performance. And it does, as the benchmark tests will show you.
In the 3D Mark 11 benchmark, the 730M has a significant advantage over the 710M on the Acer Aspire V3. However, the performance of the GT645M remains consistently better, despite the 730M boasting of higher clock speeds. The FPS advantage of the 730M over the 710M is very much visible in the Cinebench OpenGL and the Unigene Heaven benchmarks. Essentially, the Pavilion m4-1003tx will be able to handle most intensive games at the 1366 x 768 pixel resolution with medium settings. The performance will not be better than the GT645M, despite the tweaks.
Keyboard and TouchPad: Being someone whose livelihood depends on typing out articles, it is critical that the keyboard be comfortable to use, and precise in response. We had praised the keyboard in the HP ENVY dv6 to the extent that it is possibly the best keyboard we have seen on a Windows machine of late. And we are happy to report that the same has been carried forward to the Pavilion m4. Typing is a breeze, no matter how quickly (or furiously, in some cases!) you want to churn out the article. Key-spacing, and travel is excellent. Key-size is very similar to the keyboard on the MacBook Pro. It is literally a no comparison between this keyboard and the ones that the Aspire V3 and the IdeaPad Z500 came with. While the Aspire V3 does come in a solid second position, the Z500 with the curved key base does present an uncomfortable period till you get used to the design.
Unfortunately, the touchpad on the Pavilion m4 doesn’t invoke such pleasant and positive words. It is rather surprising that HP didn’t use the same matte touchpad in the bigger sibling, the ENVY dv6, and instead went with this smaller version with a dotted finish. Despite being smaller, it still has enough space for two finger scrolling and most multi-touch gestures to work properly. However, the response at all times is mostly inconsistent when it comes to scrolling. It works, and then it just stops working. Keep swiping the finger on different parts of the touchpad to see which area now detects the touch! Use an external mouse as far as possible, for even the driver updates available on HP’s support website didn’t improve the situation.
Display: The Pavilion m4’s 14-inch display has a resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels. The display quality is very good, for the amount of money you are paying for the laptop. Text is rendered very crisply, and is very much readable. The Lenovo Z500 does rival the Pavilion in terms of how well the text looks and reads. The Acer Aspire V3 has the best colour reproduction among these three, and the Z500 and the Pavilion m4 do feel a tad less rich, at least for some colours. The m4’s display is reflective without doubt, and if you aren’t keeping the brightness very high, can become a tad annoying because ambient stuff will be reflected back.
Battery: Battery life on the Pavilion m4 is very much at par with the times clocked by the Aspire V3 and the IdeaPad Z500. Under the very stressful benchmark tests, the Pavilion m4’s battery lasted 115 minutes on a single charge. This will easily translate into at least 3.5 hours of backup times under most usage scenarios.
Bottom Line
What the HP Pavilion m4-1003tx does take is the benchmark to the next level, the performance is putting all the immediate rivals in the shade – by a huge margin. The keyboard is the same brilliant one carried forward from the more expensive from ENVY dv6 notebook. Add a slim form factor, good build quality and the fact that it can game quite efficiently into the mix, and this is definitely a machine worth considering. Put that into perspective with the price tag – Rs. 49,990 – and the entire package feels like a very good deal.
  • Processor: Intel Core i5 � 3230M (2.6GHz)
  • RAM: 8GB
  • Display: 14-inch (1366 x 768 pixel)
  • Graphics: Nvidia GeForce 730M (2GB)
  • Storage: 1TB HDD
  • Connectivity: 3 USB ports, memory card reader, optical drive, HDMI out
  • OS: Windows 8 (64-bit)

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Toshiba Portege Z930 Review

Summary

When Toshiba updated the Portege Z830 with the newer processor, they just changed to the newer processor. The form factor, the rest of the specs and most importantly, the very light build remained as it is. And that keeps the Z930 as the lightest ultrabook money can buy. Performance wise, it is at par with the rest of the ultrabooks. And the alternatives you could consider include the Samsung Series 9 Ultra and the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon.
  • Review
  • Specifications & Performance
For a perfect ultrabook to remain a perfect ultrabook even after an update is a huge thing. Many an ultrabook have fallen by the wayside, since they became thicker or heavier along the way – which is why it is important to compliment Toshiba for the work it has done with the Portege Z930.
Build & Design: New Wine, Tried & Tested Bottle
The family resemblance is very much present, since the Z930 is carrying forward almost all the design elements form the Z830. And that is a good thing, because at 1.12kg, it keeps the Z930 well up there as the lightest ultrabook available in the Indian market today. The 13.3-inch version of the Samsung Series 9 weighs 1.16kg. For an ultrabook to remain light and matter to fact and not get bloated with extra weight and thickness is pretty much a miracle these days!
The magnesium alloy chassis is as premium as it gets. While the Z830 had a similar build, that particular machine didn’t feel up to it at all. With the Z930, certain niggles have been ironed out. First up, the Z930 feels classy and expensive. The finish is matte throughout, and the colour has a slightly brighter tone than on the Z830. Secondly, and the bigger issue was the not very taut display hinge on the predecessor, which has been solved now. We had mentioned during the test of the Portege Z830 that the lid tends to shake quite a bit if you are typing quickly with the ultrabook placed on your lap. With the Toshiba Portege Z930, that issue has been solved.
However, one issue still remains. The port placement – most of them are still behind the display – is still a design flaw that cannot be overlooked. Yes, the idea was to keep the Toshiba Portege Z930 as slim as possible, and we appreciate that. However, we aren’t huge fans of reaching for the USB port or the card reader either around or behind the display. But, you will probably forgive that for the slimness and the lightweight nature of the ultrabook.
Features & Specifications: Just the Processor Boost
Toshiba hasn’t changed much with the Portege Z930. Except the processor, which got the boost from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge. The one powering this machine is the Intel Core i5 - 3427U processor clocked at 1.8GHz, and is paired with 6GB of RAM. This is carried forward as is from the previous edition. One of the reasons for the blazing fast performance is the 128GB SSD. Good to see a pure Solid State Drive in the ultrabook, because the benefits of that far outweigh any negatives.
There are three USB ports, two of which are USB 3.0 ones. There is the typical combo of the memory card slot, the HDMI port and the Ethernet connector.
Performance: A Typical Ultrabook
Updated with the third-generation Intel Core processor, the Portege Z930 does massively improve on the consistent performance of the Z830, and expectedly so. The performance benchmark tests put it on almost the same level as the Fujitsu Lifebook U772. What we get is very good real world usage performance, but only after you either uninstall a lot of preloaded utilities or disable from starting up when the machine boots into Windows. However, in all cases – tests or real world usage, the Samsung Series 9 Ultra and even the Lenovo X1 Carbon feel smoother and a tad more responsive.
The Toshiba Portege Z930 is one of the rare machines with a non-reflective display. While it isn’t completely matte, what you do get is a 13.3.-inch screen that will not reflect back almost all the elements around you. While the display resolution is nothing to harp about, we really like the matte characteristics and the crispness of the written word, enhancing readability. Interesting to note that the Samsung Series 9 (13.3-inches) and the Lenovo X1 Carbon (14-inches) offer 1600 x 900 pixel resolutions. For the learned ones out there, this is something to consider before plonking down the cash.
The Toshiba Portege Z930’s battery life is good enough to get you through around 6 hours of a typical day at work, on a single charge. This is pretty much in line with what the Samsung Series 9 and the Lenovo X1 Carbon offer under the same conditions.
The Z930’s keyboard is very comfortable to use, and that is not something that we can say for a lot of laptops. This is something that we pay a lot of attention to, simply because it is a critical bit for anyone who might be using this for typing out a lot of documents. Having said that, we must specify that a sharper response to every key press would have made the keyboard even better. At the moment, there is a slight inconsistency in terms of how well an individual key responds to a tap on the Toshiba Portege Z930.
Bottom Line: For the Hardcore Fans!
Looking at the price of the Portege Z930, and it does make you wonder if it is worth this much. Honestly, it is pretty much like any ultrabook in this price tag, with no real add-on that makes this stand out in the crowd. If you want something more formal and business-like, spending a little extra on the Lenovo X1 Carbon makes sense. The Samsung Series 9 makes a lot of sense as well, because of the better display, and a design to fall in love with!
  • Processor: Intel Core i5 3427U @ 1.8GHz
  • RAM: 6GB
  • Graphics: Intel HD 4000
  • Display: 13.3-inch
  • Storage: 128GB SSD
  • Connectivity: 1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 2.0, HDMI, SD card slot
  • OS: Windows 8 (64-bit)

AMD’s Richland Desktop APUs Arrive In Style
























A famous person once was quoted as saying “You don’t have to be rich to have Richland”, well okay you got me there, so maybe not quite, but it is true however, as seen by the pricing on AMD’s latest Elite- APU series. The waiting and speculating has ended, as yesterday the latest SKUs and pricing were made public so we jumped to buy one to unbox and test for you fine folks.

Like Intel’s Haswell launch many of the key benefits to Richland will be its mobile performance in the graphics arena where AMD fans hope to see Intel get impaled and their favorite company to some out on top. In truth I think that is probably how it will be as AMD has had much more time to develop and mature their APU technology than Intel has had with embedded graphics.

There is nothing ravishingly new with the release of Richland as it was built off the existing Trinity core technology with just a few new speed bumps here and there to pump up the performance. The higher clock speeds and improved memory support will hopefully show the benefits of a mature platform. All but one line item of the newly released APU SKUs have increased GPU and CPU clocks as the A4-4000 is the budget APU and the graphics chip is as if yet to be announced on that particular model.

The maximum turbo core speeds have also been increased from 200MHz on the A10-6800K and all the way up to 400MHz on the A8-6500. Base clock speeds have also been increased ranging from 100MHZ on the entry-level models and up to 300MHz on the highest end models. Another thing of mention is that Richland APUs will be able to actually run at their targeted Turbo clock speeds where Trinity had an inclination to run more at their base clock speeds. In theory this has possible performance increases anywhere from 5% to 25% with an average boost more likely in the 10% range.


AMD has been focusing on their APU technology much longer than Intel has and on the GPU side of the coin Richland APUs have also been clocked 5-11% faster with 11% going to the A10-6700 against the A10-5700 as all others are at the 5% range. The price has also been adjusted in about the same manner so you pay for what you get in any case, but the good news however is that all existing Socket FM2 motherboards will be able to support the new APUs so need to buy a new motherboard, which is always good.

There will also be support for the A85X, A75, and A55 platforms with forward compatibility with FM2+ motherboards as well so plenty of flexibly for AMD fans. In the same light that most Ivy Bridge users will not move forward to Haswell it is most likely that Trinity users will upgrade to Richland, but the availability is there if users want to make the switch. At least with the ability to just change out an APU and keep all your existing parts the price range to upgrade to the A10-6800K is $149.00.

In price comparisons the fastest AMD APU costs $40.00 less than the lowest-end Core i5 Haswell CPU and is still priced lower by $30-$40 than a Core i5 Ivy Bridge entry level CPU showing AMD priced very competitively with Intel in this arena. If you want to see where Intel competes price wise against AMD’s A10-6800K take a look at Intel’s i3 Ivy Bridge as there is no Haswell SKU in desktop at this moment and no plans yet seen to do so. Previous generation A10 APUs have proven themselves to be very efficient in most tasks including decent gameplay, and even high end gaming only needs a stronger CPU unless you are using two or more cards.

For most high-end gaming solutions its good enough to upgrade just your graphics card and be on your way to effective 1080p gaming that will satisfy most users. We all know that for the highest performance CPUs come from Intel and that Quick Sync is great for improved video encoding, but for anything outside of those two areas AMD seems to have a solution that will satisfy many users. APUs are a great idea and in the right users system a very solid solution for a very low price. Like I stated in the opening paragraph we were able to buy a A10-6800K from Newegg the day of the break and we will be bringing you the unboxing and full review as well as battles in the next few days so stay tuned to THETECHIT.